Pathological Arbitration Clause and Franchise Contract: the Applicability of the Principle of Competence-Competence (Comments on the Decision REsp 1.602.076/SP)

Authors

  • Patrícia Cândido Alves Ferreira

Keywords:

Franchise contract, Pathological arbitration clause, Principle of Competence-Competence, Brazilian Judiciary

Abstract

The principle of Competence-Competence empowers an arbitral tribunal the priority to decide its own jurisdiction in the disputes submitted to its arbitration. This article considers, however, a decision of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice that interprets the Brazilian Arbitration Law and it has established jurisprudence in the sense that, in adhesion contracts (for example, the franchise contracts), the existence of a pathological arbitration clause allows the intervention of the Judiciary in the conflict, and this is a hypothesis of modulation of the rule of the primacy of the arbitral tribunal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-04-17

How to Cite

ALVES FERREIRA, Patrícia Cândido. Pathological Arbitration Clause and Franchise Contract: the Applicability of the Principle of Competence-Competence (Comments on the Decision REsp 1.602.076/SP). Journal of Contemporary Private Law, [S. l.], v. 13, p. 545–573, 2018. Disponível em: https://ojs.direitocivilcontemporaneo.com/index.php/rdcc/article/view/358. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Comentários de Jurisprudência

Similar Articles

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.