Contract as inequality

Autores

  • Osny da Silva Filho

Palavras-chave:

Contract law, Contract theory, Formal equality, Substantial equality, Distributive justice

Resumo

Mainstream contract theories are built on ideals of formal equality and autonomy as inde- pendence. In the last decades, however, substantial inequalities came to be pervasively acknowledged, challenging some major tenets of these mainstream theories. This article elaborates on the wide-ranging acknowledgement of inequality in contract law and discusses its theoretical and epistemological impli- cations, drawing on recent papers by Aditi Bagchi, Hanoch Dagan, and Martijn Hesselink. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Osny da Silva Filho

Mestre em Direito Civil pela Universidade de São Paulo, com período sanduíche na Universidade da Califórnia, Berkeley. Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade de São Paulo, com parte da graduação cursada na Universidade de Roma I “La Sapienza” e na Universidade de Roma II “Tor Vergata”. Professor da Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV Direito SP). 

Referências

ACKERMAN, Bruce. Regulating Slum Housing Markets on Behalf of the Poor: Of Housing Codes, Housing Subsidies and Income Redistribution Policy. Yale Law Journal, v. 80, 1971, p. 1093-1197.

ALPA, Guido. Le stagioni del contratto. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2012.

ASCARELLI, Tullio. Ordinamento giuridico e processo economico. In: ASCARELLI, Tullio. Problemi giuridici. Milano: Giuffrè, 1959, v. 1.

BAGCHI, Aditi. Contract as Procedural Justice. Jurisprudence, 2016, v. 7.

BAGCHI, Aditi. Distributive Justice and Contract. In: KLASS, Gregory; LETSAS, George; SAPRAI, Prince (eds.). Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

BENSON, Peter. The Unity of Contract Law. In: BENSON, Peter (org.). A Theory of Contract Law: New Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

BETTI, Emilio. Teoria generale del negozio giuridico (1943). 2. ed. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 1950 (1994).

CANARIS, Claus-Wilhelm. Die Bedeutung der iustitia distributiva im deutschen Vertragsrecht. München: Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997.

CESARINO JÚNIOR, Antônio Ferreira. Direito Social. São Paulo: LTr, 1980 (1940).

CHASE, Anthony R. Race, Culture and Contract Law. Connecticut Law Review, v. 28, 1995, p. 1-66.

COLLINS, Hugh. Distributive Justice through Contracts. Current Legal Problems, v. 45, 1992, p. 49-67.

CRISCUOLO, Fabrizio. Autonomia negoziale e autonomia contrattuale. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2008.

DAGAN, Hanoch; DORFMAN, Avihay. Just Relationships. Columbia Law Review, v. 116, 2016, p. 1395-1460.

DAGAN, Hanoch. The Challenges of Private Law: Towards A Research Agenda for an Autonomy-Based Private Law, 2015, working paper available at: [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2690014].

DALTON, Claire. An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine. Yale Law Journal, v. 94, 1985, p. 997-1114.

DECOCK, Win. Theologians and Contract Law. The Moral Transformation of the Ius Commune (ca. 1500-1650). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.

EIDENMÜLLER, Horst. Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts. 4. ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015 (1995).

FERRI, Luigi. L’autonomia privata. Milano: Giuffrè, 1959.

FLUME, Werner. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. v. 2. Das Rechtsgeschäft. 4. ed. Berlin: Springer, 2012 (1964).

FRANKFURT, Harry G. On Inequality, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2015.

FRIED, Charles. Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.

GOMES, Orlando. Contratos. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1959.

GOMES, Orlando. Influência da legislação do trabalho na evolução do direito. In: GOMES, Orlando. Direito do trabalho. Estudos. Salvador: Forum, 1941.

GORDLEY, James R. Foundations of Private law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

GORDLEY, James R. Myths of the French Civil Code. American Journal of Comparative Law, 42, 1994.

GORDLEY, James R. The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

GROSSI, Paolo (org.). La seconda scolastica nella formazione del diritto privato moderno. Milano: Giuffrè, 1972.

HESSELINK, Martijn W. Democratic Contract Law. European Review of Contract Law, 2015, v. 11, p. 81-126.

HESSELINK, Martijn W. Five Political Ideas of European Contract Law. European Review of Contract Law, 2011, v. 7, p. 295-313.

HESSELINK, Martijn W. Private Law, Regulation, and Justice, 2016, working paper available at: [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2744565].

HESSELINK, Martijn W. Towards a Sharp Distinction between b2b and b2c? On Consumer, Commercial and General Contract Law after the Consumer Rights Directive. European Review of Contract Law, 2010, v. 18, p. 57-102.

IRTI, Natalino. Un diritto incalcolabile. Bari: Laterza, 2016.

JANSEN, Nils. The Making of Legal Authority. Non-legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

KAPLOW, Louis; SHEVELL, Steven. Why the legal system is less efficient than the income tax in redistributing income. Journal of Legal Studies, 1994, v. 23, p. 667-681.

KENNEDY, Duncan. The Political Stakes in “Merely Technical” Issues of Contract Law. European Review of Private Law, 2001, v. 1, p. 7-28.

KENNEDY, Duncan. Three Globalizations of Legal Thought: 1850-2000. In: TRUBEK, David; SANTOS, Alvaro (eds.). The New Law and Economic Development. A Critical Appraisal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 19-73.

KLARE, Karl E. Public/Private Distinction in Labor Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1982, v. 130, p. 1358-1422.

KRONMAN, Anthony T. Contract Law and Distributive Justice. Yale Law Journal, 1980, v. 89, p. 472-511.

LOPES, José Reinaldo de Lima. As palavras e a lei. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.

LOPES, José Reinaldo de Lima. Responsabilidade civil do fabricante e a defesa do consumidor. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1992.

MARQUES, Cláudia Lima. Superação das antinomias pelo diálogo das fontes: o modelo brasileiro de coexistência entre o Código de Defesa do Consumidor e o Código Civil de 2002. Revista de direito do consumidor, 2004, v. 51, p. 34-67.

MCCLOSKEY, Deirdre N. Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.

MEDEIROS, Roberto Saboya de. Relatório geral. In: Vvaa. Anais do Primeiro Congresso de Direito Social promovido pelo Instituto de Direito Social. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Estatística da Previdência e Trabalho, 1943, v. 2.

MICKLITZ, Hanas.-W.; SVETIEV, Yane; COMPARATO, Guido (eds.). European regulatory private law – the paradigms tested (EUI Working papers, LAW 2014/04).

MILANOVIC, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016.

MINDA, Gary. Postmodern Legal Movements. Law and Jurisprudence at Century’s End. New York: New York University Press, 1995.

MONTEIRO, Washington de Barros. Curso de direito civil. Parte Geral. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1958.

MULCAHY, Linda; WHEELER, Sally (org.). Feminist Perspectives on Contract. London: Cavendish, 2005.

PEREIRA, Caio Mário da Silva. Instituições de direito civil. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1961, v. 1.

PIKETTY, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Arthur Goldhammer trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.

POSNER, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 9. ed. New York: Aspen, 2014 (1973).

POSNER, Richard A. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.

RAJAN, Raghuram G. Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.

RAMOS, Luiz Felipe Rosa; SILVA FILHO, Osny da. Orlando Gomes. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2015.

RANOUIL, Véronique. L’autonomie de la volonté: naissance et evolution d’un concept. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1980.

RODRIGUES JUNIOR, Otavio Luiz; RODAS, Sergio. Interview with Reinhard Zimmermann and Jan Peter Schmidt. Revista de direito civil contemporâneo, 2014, v. 4, p. 379-412.

SACCO, Rodolfo. Metodo del diritto civile e scontri di generazionali. In: Cesare Massimo Bianca et alii (eds.). La civilistica italiana dagli anni ’50 ad oggi tra crisi dogmatica e riforme legislative. Milano: Giuffrè, 1991.

SALAMA, Bruno Meyerhof. A história do declínio e queda do eficientismo na obra de Richard Posner. In: PÁDUA LIMA, Maria Lúcia L. M. (coord.). Trinta anos de Brasil: diálogos entre direito e economia. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.

SANCHIRICO, Chris W. Taxes versus legal rules as instruments for equity: a more equitable view. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 2000, p. 797-820.

SCHWARTZ, Alan; SCOTT, Robert. The Common Law of Contract and the Default Rule Project. Virginia Law Review, 2016, v. 102, p. 1523-1588.

SHAVELL, Steven. A Note on Efficiency vs. Distributional Equity in Legal Rulemaking: Should Distributional Equity Matter Given Optimal Income Taxation? American Economic Review, 1981, v. 71, p. 414-418.

SHIFFRIN, Seana V. The Divergence of Contract and Promise. Harvard Law Review, 2007, v. 120, p. 708-756.

SILVA, Jorge Cesa Ferreira da. A proteção contra discriminação no direito contratual brasileiro. Revista de direito civil contemporâneo, 2014, v. 1, p. 41-65.

SILVA FILHO, Osny da. Qual é o papel do direito dos contratos em uma sociedade liberal? Conjur: Direito Civil Atual [online], 05.09.2016, available at: [http://www.conjur.com.br/2016-set-05/direito-civil-atual-qual-papel-direito-contratos-sociedade-liberal].

SMITH, Stephen. Contract theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press;

STIGLITZ, Joseph. The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W. W. Norton, 2013.

STOLFI, Giuseppe. Teoria del negozio giuridico. Padova: Cedam, 1947.

TIMM, Luciano Benetti. Direito contratual brasileiro. Críticas e alternativas ao solidarismo jurídico. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015 (2008, O novo direito contratual brasileiro).

TOMASETTI JÚNIOR, Alcides. Abuso de poder econômico e abuso de poder contratual. Revista dos Tribunais, 1995, v. 84, p. 87-107.

VILLEY, Michel. Essor et décadence du volontarisme juridique. Archives de Philosophie du Droit, 1957, v. 4, p. 87-98.

WEBER, Max. Economy and society (Guenther Roth & Claus Wittich eds.). Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1968.

WEINRIB, Ernest J. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

WIEACKER, Franz. A History of Private Law in Europe: With Particular Reference to Germany (Tony Weir trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

WILLISTON, Samuel. The Law of Contracts (4 vols.). New York: Baker, Voorhis, 1920.

ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard. Roman Law and the Harmonization of Private Law in Europe. In: Arthur Severijn Hartkamp et alii (org.). Towards a European Civil Code. 4. ed. Alphen: Kluwer, 2010 (1994).

Downloads

Publicado

2017-11-26

Como Citar

DA SILVA FILHO, Osny. Contract as inequality. Revista de Direito Civil Contemporâneo , [S. l.], v. 12, p. 89–107, 2017. Disponível em: https://ojs.direitocivilcontemporaneo.com/index.php/rdcc/article/view/312. Acesso em: 2 nov. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Doutrina Nacional

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.